
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Table 3: Adjusted1 Odds Ratio for Factors associated with diabetic retinopathy
Variables |
DR |
p value |
|---|---|---|
Duration of DM |
|
|
<5 yrs |
1.0 |
<0.001 |
5-10 yrs |
2.5 (1.6 to 3.9) |
|
11-15 yrs |
3.7 (2.2 to 6.1) |
|
16-20 yrs |
5.6 (2.5 to 12.3) |
|
>20 yrs |
6.0 (2.8 to 12.9) |
|
BMI |
|
|
≥23.0 |
1.0 |
0.013 |
<22.9 |
1.8 (1.1 to 2.8) |
|
HT control (mm/Hg) |
|
|
Optimal <130/80 |
1.0 |
0.121 |
Fair 130/80 to 140/90 |
1.1 (0.7 to 1.8) |
|
Sub-optimal >140/90 |
1.6 (1.0 to 2.5) |
|
Visual loss |
|
|
Normal 6/6 |
1.0 |
0.009 |
Mild 6/9 to 6/12 |
1.0 (0.7 to 1.5) |
|
Moderate 6/18 to 6/60 |
2.1 (1.3 to 3.5) |
|
1Each odds ratio is adjusted for all other variables in the table
As about 20% of the patients were Sarawak native (Bidayuh, Iban and other natives) of which very little data were available for this ethnic group, our study found that the prevalence of retinopathy of the native were comparable to the other ethnic group.
The proportion of patients with DR in our study was 23.7%. This was much lower than the prevalence found in other hospital based studies11,12 and some community base studies20-22 in Malaysia, where DR were detected in 31-50% of the patients studied. This could be due to our study reported findings from a primary health care centre where fundus photography was done for screening of asymptomatic patients with diabetes. This group of patients might have less complication as patients with complications might have been referred to referral centres in hospitals. This figure was comparable with the prevalence range of 10.5-26.2% found in other population based studies in India and United Kingdom,23-25 but it is lower compared to other community based studies in Singapore and China.26-27 The Singapore study26 were on patients being referred from the primary health care centres to the hospital, this group of patients may have been screened earlier before being referred, so the possibility of DR is higher. Secondly, the differences of the racial composition in these studies26,27 where majority were Chinese whereas in our study, there were almost equal combination of Chinese, Malay and native, may have contributed to the differences. Although it was not statistically significant, the proportion of natives found to have DR were lower in our study. Further study is needed to explore these differences. NPDR was the commonest form of DR seen in our study which is consistent with other studies.25-28
Previous studies had found that patients with a longer duration of diabetes has a higher risk of developing DR.26-27,29-34 We also found association between the duration of DM and the presence of DR. The odds of developing DR was 2.5 times higher for a patient with duration of diagnosis between five to 10 years when compared to a patients with <5 years of diabetes and the odds of developing DR increased 1.2 to 1.9 times with each increase of five years. Another local study12 and studies from Singapore, Thailand and China found similar trend in association of duration of DM with the risk of developing DR.26,27,34 However, Thailand’s study34 shown much lower odds ratio of DR development at the similar interval of disease duration. Better control of diabetes among patients in tertiary centres in the Thailand study34 may be the contributing factor for the differences.
We found an inverse relationship between BMI and DR. Patients with lower BMI were more likely compared to obese and overweight to develop DR. Similar inverse relationship was reported in other studies in India.23,35 However, the association of BMI and DR has not been consistently demonstrated in all studies. Study in China found no significant association of BMI and DR.27 In some studies conducted in developed countries, higher BMI is associated with DR subjects with T2DM.36,37
Visual loss was associated with higher risk of DR in our study. Study in India also showed higher percentage of moderate to severe visual loss among patients with PDR.28
In our study, the control of systemic hypertension and separate analysis of systolic and diastolic BP was found not significantly associated with the presence of DR in the multivariate analysis. This is inconsistent with another local hospital base study where hypertension were reported to be associated with higher risk of DR.12 The low proportion of patients with BP at >140/90 mmHg (35.5%) in this study may have contributed to the differences in our findings.
Other studies found association of renal impairment, cardiovascular diseases and anaemia with DR.5-7 The small number of patients reported with these risk factors from our study could have contributed to the negative findings.
Other studies reported higher HbA1c levels positively associated with NPDR, PDR and macular oedema.29,30 The disproportionately low numbers of patients with optimal HbA1c may have contributed to the insignificant association of HbA1c to the presence of DR in this study. Serum lipids have been found inconsistently associated with DR in various studies.38-41 Although majority of our patients had dyslipidemia, but we could not find any significant association of serum lipids with DR. The negative findings of this association found from our study add further evidence to the inconsistency of this association.
There were some limitations in our study. Firstly, the cross-sectional nature of the study cannot provide temporal information for the significant associations reported. Secondly, we did not have the information of the blood glucose level in our patients. Thirdly, socio economic and psychosocial factors, health care access and utilisation factors which was not assessed in this study, may modified the relationship between the known risk factors and risk of having DR.42 Fourthly, our fundus photography included only the standard 2-fields out of the standard 7-fields. These could have underestimated the actual prevalence of DR. Finally, the relatively small number of people with proliferative DR and macular oedema limits our ability to assess associations with these subtypes of DR.
In summary, this study provides data on risk factors associated with DR in a mixed ethnic population including native in Borneo Islands at a primary health care setting. We confirm associations of DR with diabetic duration, BMI and visual loss. Our data provide preliminary findings to help to improve the preventive strategies at the primary health care setting. Ideally, according to the guideline,16 all patients with diabetes should have screening fundus examination done at least once a year. However, data from the latest National Health Survey found that more than half of patients with known DM had never undergone an eye examination.43 In the constraint of time and facilities, a selection of patients with higher risk factors like longer duration of disease, lower BMI and those who had moderate visual loss for priority of earlier screening may be a better strategy to enable the detection of patients with DR earlier.
The authors would like to thank the staffs of KKJM, and SN Asmarlina binti Che Aris for their assistance and support in conducting the study. We would also like to acknowledge the Director General of Health of Malaysia, the Department of Health, Ministry of Health, Sarawak, Malaysia and Universiti Malaysia Sarawak. We would also like to extend our thanks to Prof KG Rampal for his statistical guidance.