Validating instruments of measure : Is it really necessary?

  • PSM Lai

Abstract

In this April issue of the Malaysian Family Physician, there are two manuscripts on the validation of instruments. The first manuscript is the validation of the Malay version of the Berlin Questionnaire to identify Malaysian patients at risk for obstructive sleep apnea,1 whilst the second manuscript is on the validation of the Malay version of the Diabetes Quality of Life for Youth Questionnaire.2

All instruments assessing patient reported outcomes have to be evaluated for its reliability and validity in the country prior to its use. The purpose of this is to ensure that the instrument used is measuring what it is supposed to measure. This is applicable to instruments that have been developed in English by other authors, and validated elsewhere; as well as self-developed instruments or those that have been modified (e.g. translated into another language or otherwise). (copied from article)

References

Yunus A, Seet W, Mohamad Adam B, Haniff J. Validation of the Malay version of Berlin questionaire to identify Malaysian patients for obstructive sleep apnea. Malaysian Family Physician 2013;8(1):03-9

Mohamad Adam B, Jalaludin MY, Fuziah MZ, Hadhrami MH, Janet YH Hong, Jamaiyah H. Reliability and validity of the Malay translated version of diabetes quality of life for youth questionaire. Malaysian Family Physician 2013;8(1):10-7.

Gorsuch RL. Factor analysis. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, N.J: L. Erlbaum Associates; 1983.

Colorado State University. Stability reliability and internal consistency. 1993 [cited 2009 31 March]; Available from: http://writing.colostate.edu/guides/research/relval/com2a3.cfm.

Archambault S. Spearman rho. Psychology Department, Wellesley College; 2000 [updated 31 July 2000; cited 2009 17 May]; Available from: http://www.wellesley.edu/Psychology/Psych205/spearman.html.

Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16(3): 297-334.

Devellis RF. Scale Development. Sage Publications; 1991. p. 24-33.

Campell DT, Fiske DW. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitraitmultimethod matrix Psychological Bulletin1959. p. 81-105.

Carmines EG, Zeller RA. Reliability and viability assessment. CA: Thousand Oaks; 1991.

Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, Eremenco S, McElroy S, VerjeeLorenz A, et al. Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value Health. 2005;8(2):94-104.

Published
2012-03-31
Section
Articles