Common ethical issues in research and publication
AbstractResearch is the pillar of knowledge, and it constitutes an integral part of progress. In the fast-expanding field of biomedical research, this has improved the quality and quantity of life. Historically, medical doctors have been in the privileged position to carry out research, especially in clinical research which involves people. They are able to control “life and death” of patients and have free access to their confidential information. Moreover, medical researchers have also enjoyed immunity from accountability due to high public regard for science and medicine. This has resulted in some researchers conducting unethical researches. For instance, in World War II, medical doctors had conducted unethical experiments on human in the name of science, resulting in harm and even death in some cases.More recently, the involvement of pharmaceutical industry in clinical trials have raised issues about how to safeguard patient’s care and to ensure the published research findings are objective. (copied from article)
Human D, Fluss SS. The World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: historical and contemporary perspectives. World Medical Association, 2001.
Lexchin J, Bero LA, Djulbegovic B, Clark O. Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality. BMJ. 2003;326:1167-70.
World Medical association. Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. Updated 2004.
Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Guidelines on good publication and the Code of Conduct. 2005.
Smith R. Medical journals are an extension of the marketing arm of pharmaceutical companies. PLoS Med. 2005;2:100-2.
Medical Research Council. MRC Guidelines for good clinical practice in clinical trials. London: MRC, 1998.
Giles J. Taking on the cheats. Nature. 2005; 435: 258-9.