
CASE REPORT
A Farnaza MRCGP(INT), JCPTGP(UK); L Baha PhD Parasitology(UK)
Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM), Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia (Farnaza Ariffin, Baha Latif)
Address for correspondence: Dr Farnaza Ariffin, Senior Lecturer in Primary Care Medicine and Family Medicine Specialist, Faculty of Medicine, UniversitI Teknologi MARA, Selayang Campus, Jalan Prima Selayang 7, 68100 Batu Caves, Selangor Darul Ehsan. Tel: +3 6126 4691, Email: farnaza@salam.uitm.edu.my. Prof Dr Baha Latif, Professor in Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Institute of Medical and Molecular Biotechnology, Sungai Buloh Campus, Jalan University, 47000 Sungai Buloh, Selangor Darul Ehsan. Email: bahaa@salam.uitm.edu.my
Conflict of interest: None to declare.
ABSTRACT
A 27-year-old man presented with a two-week history of central colicky abdominal pain associated with loose stools. Further history revealed that he had been exposed to contaminated waters. Stool investigation by direct wet stool smears revealed the presence of Entamoeba histolytica and Blastocystis hominis cysts. A diagnosis of amoebiasis secondary to E. histolytica and concurrent B. hominis infestation was made. We would like to emphasise the importance of clinical history including recent travel to endemic areas. Any suspicion of parasitic infection should prompt the clinician to investigate. Early diagnosis and management would prevent serious complications associated with E. Histolytica infection.
Keywords: Abdominal pain, diarrhoea, parasitic infection, Entamoeba histolytica, Blastocystis hominis.
Farnaza A, Baha L. Parasitic infection in a young man presenting with non-specific abdominal pain. Malaysian Family Physician. 2010;5(3):148-150
Abdominal pain is the fifteenth most common presentation in primary care. In a young adult, the most common causes are dyspepsia, biliary colic, appendicitis, gastroenteritis and renal colic.1 History and examination are the most important tools in making a differential diagnosis and in determining the appropriate investigations to include or exclude the diagnosis. A history of more than 14 days abdominal pain and diarrhoea should prompt the clinician to consider less common causes for persistent diarrhoea such as parasitic infection.
A 27-year-old man presented with a two-week history of central colicky abdominal pain. The pain was intermittent with bouts of increasing severity. He reported that the pain was aggravated by eating and he also suffered from feeling bloated. He reported feeling slightly feverish intermittently but his temperature was normal during clinical examination. The patient was previously fit and healthy with no previous gastrointestinal complaints.
He initially presented to an emergency department and was diagnosed with dyspepsia. He was sent home with antacids with no symptomatic relief. He then saw a general practitioner and was suspected to have parasitic infection but stool culture was not done. He was given a three-day course of low dose metronidazole. He went again to an emergency department and an X-ray was done. He was diagnosed with constipation and was prescribed some laxatives. He then presented with watery diarrhoea without any blood or mucus in the stools. He continued to have abdominal pain and diarrhoea and was seen in a specialist primary care clinic.
It was difficult to make a definitive diagnosis since the symptoms of abdominal pain and diarrhoea was vague and possibly masked by the use of laxatives and antibiotics. However, further history revealed that 20 days prior to the initial symptoms, he went to a rural area and swam in a river there. This prompted the clinician to suspect parasitic infection and ordered stool culture to be done.
On examination, his vital signs were normal. The abdomen was mildly tender around the umbilical and right iliac region. There was a possible mass felt in the right lower quadrant. Therefore, a diagnosis of an appendix mass could not be excluded. The differential diagnosis at this point was appendicitis, mesenteric adenitis, drug induced diarrhoea and parasitic intestinal infection.
Investigations were done including full blood count (FBC) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) to look for markers that indicate infection or inflammation. Abdominal ultrasound was done to exclude an appendix mass and a stool culture ordered. He was given symptomatic advice to increase his fluid intake and to take regular analgesia. He was given a follow up appointment in one week. He was also given advice to see a doctor urgently if he developed acute severe abdominal pain that might be attributed to an acute appendicitis.
The FBC result revealed raised white cell count (Table 1). His ultrasound scan was reported as normal.
Table 1: Full blood count result
Full blood count |
Results |
Reference values |
|---|---|---|
Haemoglobin (Hb) |
18.1 |
13-18 g/dL |
Red blood cell (RBC) |
5.72 |
3.8-5.3 x 106/µL |
Haemoglobin concentration |
34.7 |
32-36 g/dL |
Mean corpuscular volume |
91.3 |
80-100 fL |
Mean corpuscular haemoglobin |
31.6 |
27-32 pg |
Red blood cell distribution width |
12.40 |
10-16.5% |
White blood cell (WBC) |
22.0 |
4-9 x 103/µL |
Granulocyte |
75.5 |
42-85% |
Monocyte |
2.4 |
0-9% |
Lymphocyte |
22.1 |
11-49% |
Platelet |
331 |
120-380 x 103/µL |
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) |
6.0 |
0-15 mm in first hour |
In the laboratory, direct wet stool smears were performed on slides by mixing a small amount of stool (about 2 gm) on the end of a wooden applicator stick with a drop of normal saline and Lugol’s iodine solution. Five stool smears were prepared and examined under the light microscope using the objectives (40 X, 100 X).
Parasitological examination of five direct wet stool smears revealed the presence of E. histolytica and B.hominis cysts. Only three out of five stool smears were showed positive result (Table 2). Identification of E. histolytica cyst was based on the nuclear morphology. One to two nuclei appeared in the cyst with evenly arranged chromatin on the nuclear membrane and the presence of a central karyosome. B.hominis cyst appears thick wall, round with large central-body and multiple nuclei around the edges.
Table 2: Detection of E. histolytica and B. hominis cysts in five stool smears
Smear no. |
E. histolytica |
B. hominis |
|---|---|---|
1 |
+ |
Nil |
2 |
+ |
+ |
3 |
+ |
+ |
4 |
Nil |
Nil |
5 |
Nil |
+ |
In summary, this is a 27-year-old man presented with a two weeks history of abdominal pain and watery diarrhoea. There was a possible exposure to parasites from contaminated water. His ultrasound report was normal, he had a raised white cell count and stool examination revealed the presence of cysts of E. histolytica and B. hominis. A diagnosis of amoebiasis secondary to E. histolytica with concurrent B. hominis infestation was made. He was treated with metronidazole 750 mg three times a day for ten days and a repeat stool examination was done a week post treatment. Patient was reviewed and found to be asymptomatic and stool examination results were negative.
Blastocystis hominis is commonly found in asymptomatic individuals. This parasite is not considered as a pathogen but may sometimes produce symptoms of diarrhoea in some individuals.2 It is thought that B. hominis is found alongside more pathogenic organisms such as E. histolytica and it is advisable to look for other organisms when parasitic infection is suspected.
Entamoeba histolytica is known for its pathogenesis in the human gut. Infection caused by E. histolytica is known as amoebiasis. E. histolytica is one of the most common parasites responsible for the majority of intestinal diseases in man.3,4 A prevalence study conducted in Kuala Lumpur found that out of the 246 stool sample, 0.4% was positive for E. histolytica.5
The pathogenesis of E. histolytica begins with the ingestion of the parasite cyst. The trophozoite emerges from the ingested cyst in the stomach and duodenum, dividing rapidly and passing into the caecum. These trophozoites may invade the intestinal epithelium causing symptoms to its host.
The clinical presentation of amoebic infection may vary widely. Careful history including onset of diarrhoea, history of travel, source of drinking water and systemic review is important. Patients may present four days post-exposure or up to a year later. Symptoms range from mild to severe diarrhoea, abdominal cramps, fever, nausea, vomiting and flatulence or chronic presentation such as weeks of abdominal cramps, general discomfort, anorexia, weight loss and malaise. Severe symptoms of bloody diarrhoea and dehydration may occur with amoebic dysentery.
The most common extra-intestinal infection is amoebic hepatitis or liver abscess.6 More rare extra-intestinal sites include the peritoneum, pericardium, brain or genitourinary tract. Acute appendicitis caused by E. histolytica is a rare complication with a few cases reported in Japan.7
The diagnosis of this patient was based on stool culture examination under the microscope. This is a common technique used in the laboratory. However, it is poor in distinguishing between Entamoeba histolytica and Entamoeba dispar.8 E. dispar is a commensal and the two are genetically different. Newer methods using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique or stool polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique are better at detecting E. histolytica.8 However, these techniques are used mainly in research and non-endemic areas. The role for better and more accurate investigation techniques in areas that are endemic is an important public health discussion.
The treatment for E. histolytica is a nitroimidazole derivative such as metronidazole, tinnidazole and ornidazole. However, metronidazole is commonly used due to its availability. It is also a treatment for B. hominis. Luminal agents such as diloxanide are used in chronic or severe infections to prevent complications.8 However, it is not widely available. A newer thiazolide anti-infective agent, nitazoxanide, is shown to work against E. histolytica but is still unavailable in many countries.9
The patient is treated with a higher dose of metronidazole 750 mg three times a day for 10 days. This is important to ensure eradication of the infection and to avoid chronic infection or complications.
We suspected that the patient contracted E. histolytica and B. hominis from swallowing contaminated water whilst swimming in the local river. Despite a non-specific presentation, any degree of suspicion of parasitic infection should prompt the clinical to investigate the patient. Although this patient presented with mild symptoms but amoebiasis can potentially be serious. Early diagnosis and treatment is recommended.