ORIGINAL ARTICLES
PREVALENCE OF DIABETIC RETINOPATHY IN A PRIMARY CARE SETTING USING DIGITAL RETINAL IMAGING TECHNOLOGY
COMMENTARY
Sagili Chandrasekhara Reddy MS(Ophth) FRCS(Glasg), International
Medical University
Reddy SC. Commentary on "Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in
a primary care setting using digital retinal imaging technology."
Malaysian Family Physician. 2006;1(1):22
The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy as determined by digital retinal
imaging technology in this study was surprisingly high: 71.9% overall
and 63.9% among those diagnosed less than one year. The prevalence rates
are higher than hospital series using dilated direct ophthalmoscopy (44.1%
from University Hospital Kuala Lumpur,1 and 48.6% from Hospital
University Sains Malaysia2). Is this due to the high sensitivity
of retinal photography or false positives? We cannot ascertain this in
the absence of verification by a gold standard. Undilated ophthalmoscopy
by non-ophthalmologists has low sensitivity;3 hence retinal
photography appears to offer a solution for the currently low screening
rate of diabetic eyes. However, its high cost (prices vary depending on
the model) raise the question as to whether it is a cost effective approach
in primary care. Study in UK general practice showed that the addition
of fundus photography to routine direct ophthalmoscopy improved the detection
of sight-threatening retinopathy.4 In deciding whether to provide
fundus photography service, general practitioners should
REFERENCES
- Teoh GH, Yow CS, Ngan A, Zaini A. Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy
in the University Hospital diabetic population. Med J Malaysia. 1983
Mar;38(1):77-9 [PubMed]
- Shriwas SR, Rahman Isa AB, Reddy SC, et al. Risk factors for retinopathy
in diabetes mellitus in Kelantan, Malaysia. Med J Malaysia. 1996 Dec;51(4):447-52
[PubMed]
- Fong DS, Aiello LP, Ferris FL 3rd, Klein R. Diabetic retinopathy.
Diabetes Care. 2004 Oct;27(10):2540-53 [PubMed] [Full text]
- O’Hare JP, Hopper A, Madhaven C, et al. Adding retinal photography
to screening for diabetic retinopathy: a prospective study in primary
care. BMJ. 1996 Mar 16;312(7032):679-82
[PubMed] [Full text]